Keywords
How to Cite
Abstract
This study aims to provide a comprehensive framework for examining the voices of students regarding the use of ChatGPT as an AWE tool, and what challenges and conveniences are associated with using ChatGPT. This narrative inquiry research explores the diverse perspectives of students in the context of ChatGPT in Automated Writing Evaluation. The findings of this study explained that students' perspectives on the integration of AI technologies in higher education highlight the need to ethically integrate AI technologies into education, taking into account responsible practices. Therefore, it is suggested that the integration of ChatGPT in the students' writing process should be accompanied by careful consideration of the ethical ramifications and potential impact on students’ academic progress.
References
Alkaissi, H., & Mcfarlane, S. I. (2023). Artificial Hallucinations in ChatGPT : Implications in Scientific Writing. 15(2), 2–5. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.35179
Barrett, A., & Pack, A. (2023). Not quite eye to A.I.: student and teacher perspectives on the use of generative artificial intelligence in the writing process. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00427-0
Borchers, C., Carvalho, P. F., Xia, M., Liu, P., Koedinger, K. R., & Aleven, V. (2023). What Makes Problem-Solving Practice Effective? Comparing Paper and AI Tutoring. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics): Vol. 14200 LNCS. Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-42682-7_4
Braun, V., Clarke, V., Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2017). Applied Qualitative Research in Psychology. Applied Qualitative Research in Psychology, 0887(2006). https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-35913-1
Buruk, O. (2023). Academic Writing with GPT-3 . 5 ( ChatGPT ): Reflections on Practices , Efficacy and Transparency. 5, 144–153. https://doi.org/10.1145/3616961.3616992
Chen, T. (2022). ChatGPT and other artificial intelligence applications speed up scientific writing. 351–353. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-023-10136-0.2.
Conijn, R., Martinez-Maldonado, R., Knight, S., Buckingham Shum, S., Van Waes, L., & van Zaanen, M. (2022). How to provide automated feedback on the writing process? A participatory approach to design writing analytics tools. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(8), 1838–1868. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1839503
Cotos, E. (2011). Potential of Automated Writing Evaluation Feedback. 28(2).
Dai, W., Lin, J., Jin, F., Li, T., & Tsai, Y. (2023). Can Large Language Models Provide Feedback to Students ? A Case Study on ChatGPT.
Dergaa, I., Chamari, K., Zmijewski, P., & Saad, H. Ben. (2023). From human writing to artificial intelligence generated text: examining the prospects and potential threats of ChatGPT in academic writing. Biology of Sport, 40(2), 615–622. https://doi.org/10.5114/BIOLSPORT.2023.125623
Fitria, T. N. (2023). Artificial intelligence (AI) technology in OpenAI ChatGPT application: A review of ChatGPT in writing English essay. ELT Forum: Journal of English Language Teaching, 12(1), 44–58. https://doi.org/10.15294/elt.v12i1.64069
Flower, L., & Hayes, J. R. (1981). A Cognitive Process Theory of Writing. College Composition and Communication, 32(4), 365. https://doi.org/10.2307/356600
Fusch, P, I., & Ness, L, R. (2015). Are we there yet? Data Saturation in Qualitative Research. The Qualitative Report, 20(9), 1408.
Habibi, A., Muhaimin, M., Danibao, B. K., Wibowo, Y. G., Wahyuni, S., & Octavia, A. (2023). ChatGPT in higher education learning: Acceptance and use. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 5(December), 100190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100190
Hamp-Lyons, Liz, E. (1991). Assessing Second Language Writing in Academic Contexts. Ablex Publishing Corporation.
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487
Herbold, S., Hautli-Janisz, A., Heuer, U., Kikteva, Z., & Trautsch, A. (2023). A large-scale comparison of human-written versus ChatGPT-generated essays. Scientific Reports, 13(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-45644-9
Huang, J., & Tan, M. (2023). The role of ChatGPT in scientific communication: writing better scientific review articles. American Journal of Cancer Research, 13(4), 1148–1154.
Imran, M. (2023). Analyzing the role of ChatGPT as a writing assistant at higher education level : A systematic review of the literature. 15(4).
Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., Gasser, U., Groh, G., Günnemann, S., Hüllermeier, E., Krusche, S., Kutyniok, G., Michaeli, T., Nerdel, C., Pfeffer, J., Poquet, O., Sailer, M., Schmidt, A., Seidel, T., … Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good ? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. 103(February). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274
Marzuki, Widiati, U., Rusdin, D., Darwin, & Indrawati, I. (2023). The impact of AI writing tools on the content and organization of students’ writing: EFL teachers’ perspective. Cogent Education, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2236469
Michel-villarreal, R., Vilalta-perdomo, E., & Salinas-navarro, D. E. (2023). education sciences Challenges and Opportunities of Generative AI for Higher Education as Explained by ChatGPT.
Parker, J. L., Becker, K., & Carroca, C. (2023). ChatGPT for Automated Writing Evaluation in Scholarly Writing Instruction. Journal of Nursing Education, 62(12), 721–727. https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20231006-02
Parra, G. L., & Calero, S. X. (2019). Automated writing evaluation tools in the improvement of the writing skill. International Journal of Instruction, 12(2), 209–226. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12214a
Rahman, M. (2023). applied sciences ChatGPT for Education and Research : Opportunities , Threats , and Strategies.
Sadler, D. R. (2010). Beyond feedback: Developing student capability in complex appraisal. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(5), 535–550. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930903541015
Salvagno, M., Taccone, F. S., & Gerli, A. G. (2023). Can artificial intelligence help for scientific writing? Critical Care, 27(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-023-04380-2
Seung, H., & Bom, H. (2023). Exploring the Opportunities and Challenges of ChatGPT in Academic Writing : a Roundtable Discussion. Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 57(4), 165–167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13139-023-00809-2
Shidiq, M. (2023). the Use of Artificial Intelligence-Based Chat-Gpt and Its Challenges for the World of Education; From the Viewpoint of the Development of Creative Writing Skills. Society and Humanity, 01(01), 2023.
Sulistyo, T., Eltris, K. P. N., Mafulah, S., Budianto, S., Saiful, S., & Heriyawati, D. F. (2020). Portfolio assessment: Learning Outcomes and Students’ Attitudes. Studies in English Language and Education, 7(1), 141–153. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v7i1.15169
Tedjo, E. W. (2022). Providing Online Feedback Using an AI Proof-reading Tool to Enhance Student Surface-Level Writing Skills. EBONY: Journal of English Language Teaching, Linguistics, and Literature, 2(1), 37–45. https://doi.org/10.37304/ebony.v2i1.4040
Wang. (2021). Factors Affecting the Adoption of AI-Based Applications in Higher Education : An Analysis of Teachers ’ Perspectives Using Structural Equation Modeling. 24, 116–129.
Yoon, S., Miszoglad, E., & Pierce, L. R. (2023). Evaluation of ChatGPT feedback on ELL writers ’ Coherence and Cohesion. 1–24.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2025 Author and CALL-EJ