Abstract
Despite growing interest in Artificial Intelligence (AI)-driven educational technologies, limited research has explored how AI-powered gamification influences both the cognitive and affective dimensions of language learning, particularly in EFL contexts. Grounded in Cognitive Load Theory (CLT) and Self-Determination Theory (SDT), this study inspected the impacts of AI-powered gamification on English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners’ cognitive load (CL), motivation, and long-term retention of vocabulary and grammar. By using an experimental mixed-methods design, 85 Saudi EFL learners were randomly assigned to either an experimental group (EG) that engaged with an AI-powered gamified platform or a control group (CG) applying a non-gamified, content-equivalent digital platform. Over a six-week period, both groups received identical instructional content delivered in differing formats. Quantitative data were gathered through a motivation questionnaire, a modified CL scale, and a delayed posttest on vocabulary and grammar retention. Qualitative data were collected from semi-structured interviews. The gained findings demonstrated that the EG significantly outperformed the CG in posttest measures of motivation and long-term retention, while reporting significantly lower levels of CL. Thematic analysis of interview data highlighted key advantages of gamification, including enhanced engagement, reduced mental effort, and improved confidence. Students stressed the motivational impact of game elements, the value of personalized AI feedback, and the perceived effectiveness of the gamified platform in developing language retention. These outcomes offer that AI-powered gamification can serve as a useful instructional instrument for enhancing learning outcomes in EFL contexts by fostering motivation, reducing cognitive strain, and improving the durability of language knowledge. Practically, the findings inform EFL pedagogy in Saudi Arabia by suggesting ways to integrate adaptive technologies into centralized curricula, guide instructional designers in creating engaging digital tools, and support policymakers in promoting EdTech adoption to address motivation and retention challenges.
References
Aldalur, I., & Perez, A. (2023). Gamification and discovery learning: Motivating and involving students in the learning process. Heliyon, 9(1), e13135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13135
Almeida, C., Kalinowski, M., Uchôa, A., & Feijó, B. (2023). Negative effects of gamification in education software: Systematic mapping and practitioner perceptions. Information and Software Technology, 156, 107142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2022.107142
Al-Seghayer, K. (2014). The four most common constraints affecting English teaching in Saudi Arabia. International Journal of English Linguistics, 4(5), 17–26. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v4n5p17
Bhutoria, A. (2022). Personalized education and artificial intelligence in the United States, China, and India: A systematic review using a human-in-the-loop model. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, 100068. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100068
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Capatina, A., Juarez-Varon, D., Micu, A., & Micu, A. E. (2024). Leveling up in corporate training: Unveiling the power of gamification to enhance knowledge retention, knowledge sharing, and job performance. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 9(3), 100530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2024.100530
Cheng, Y. M. (2023). How gamification and social interaction stimulate MOOCs continuance intention via cognitive presence, teaching presence and social presence?. Library Hi Tech, 41(6), 1781-1801.
Choustoulakis, E., Athanasopoulou, P., Pollalis, Y., & Nikoloudakis, D. (2024, October). Integrating artificial intelligence with gamification techniques to enhance student motivation and engagement. In The International Conference on Strategic Innovative Marketing and Tourism (pp. 533-541). Springer Nature Switzerland.
Dahri, N. A., Yahaya, N., Al-Rahmi, W. M., Almuqren, L., Almgren, A. S., Alshimai, A., & Al-Adwan, A. S. (2025). The effect of AI gamification on students’ engagement and academic achievement: SEM analysis perspectives. IEEE Access, PP(99), 1–1. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3560567
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Springer.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2013). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Springer Science & Business Media.
Du, J., & Daniel, B. K. (2024). Transforming language education: A systematic review of AI-powered chatbots for English as a foreign language speaking practice. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6, 100230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100230
Edwards, O. V., & Taasoobshirazi, G. (2022). Social presence and teacher involvement: The link with expectancy, task value, and engagement. The Internet and Higher Education, 55, 100869. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2022.100869
Fang, F., & Baker, W. (2021). Exploring engagement of users of global Englishes in a community of inquiry. System, 98, 102478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102478
Garrison, D. R. (2016). E-learning in the 21st century: A community of inquiry framework for research and practice. Routledge.
Gul, S., & Khan, A. (2024). English learning in the AI era: How technology is revolutionizing language acquisition. Social Sciences Spectrum, 3(4), 112-128.
Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T., & Bond, A. (2020). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. EDUCAUSE Review. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/3/the-difference-between-emergency-remote-teaching-and-online-learning
Hong, Y., Saab, N., & Admiraal, W. (2024). Approaches and game elements used to tailor digital gamification for learning: A systematic literature review. Computers & Education, 212, 105000. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.105000
Hu, C., Li, F., Wang, S., Gao, Z., Pan, S., & Qing, M. (2025). The role of artificial intelligence in enhancing personalized learning pathways and clinical training in dental education. Cogent Education, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2303456
Huang, A. Y. Q., Lu, O. H. T., & Yang, S. J. H. (2023). Effects of artificial intelligence–enabled personalized recommendations on learners’ learning engagement, motivation, and outcomes in a flipped classroom. Computers & Education, 194, 104684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104684
Huber, S. E., Cortez, R., Kiili, K., Lindstedt, A., & Ninaus, M. (2023). Game elements enhance engagement and mitigate attrition in online learning tasks. Computers in Human Behavior, 149, 107948. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2023.107948
Hughes, A. (2020). Testing for language teachers. Cambridge University Press.
Jafarian, N. R., & Kramer, A.-W. (2025). AI-assisted audio-learning improves academic achievement through motivation and reading engagement. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 8, 100357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100357
Jiang, X., Wang, R., Hoang, T., Ranaweera, C., Dong, C., & Myers, T. (2025). AI-powered gamified scaffolding: Transforming learning in virtual learning environment. Electronics, 14(13), 2732. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics14132732
Kabudi, T., Pappas, I., & Olsen, D. H. (2021). AI-enabled adaptive learning systems: A systematic mapping of the literature. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2, 100017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100017
Katona, J., & Katonane Gyonyoru, K. I. (2025). Integrating AI-based adaptive learning into the flipped classroom model to enhance engagement and learning outcomes. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 8, 100392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100392
Koivisto, J., & Hamari, J. (2019). The rise of motivational information systems: A review of gamification research. International Journal of Information Management, 45, 191–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.10.013
Krashen, S. D. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Pergamon.
Lee, H.-Y., & Wu, T.-T. (2025). Enhancing blended learning discussions with a Scaffolded Knowledge Integration–Based ChatGPT mobile instant messaging system. Computers & Education, 237, 105375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2025.105375
Lin, C. J., Hwang, G. J., Fu, Q. K., & Chen, J. F. (2018). A flipped contextual game-based learning approach to enhancing EFL students’ English business writing performance and reflective behaviors. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 21(3), 117-131. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26458512
Long, M. H. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. C. Ritchie & T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413–468). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012589042-7/50015-3
Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Mohamed, A. M., Shaaban, T. S., Bakry, S. H., Guillén-Gámez, F. D., & Strzelecki, A. (2025). Empowering the Faculty of Education students: Applying AI’s potential for motivating and enhancing learning. Innovative Higher Education, 50, 587–609. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-024-09747-z
Nouraldeen, A. S., & Elyas, T. (2014). Learning English in Saudi Arabia: a socio-cultural perspective. International Journal of English Language and Linguistics Research, 2(3), 56-78.
Paas, F., Tuovinen, J. E., Tabbers, H., & Van Gerven, P. W. (2016). Cognitive load measurement as a means to advance cognitive load theory. In Cognitive load theory (pp. 63-71). Routledge.
Pham, S. T., & Sampson, P. M. (2022). The development of artificial intelligence in education: A review in context. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 38(5), 1408-1421. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12687
Ratinho, E., & Martins, C. (2023). The role of gamified learning strategies in students’ motivation in high school and higher education: A systematic review. Heliyon, 9(8), e19033. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19033
Safdar, U., Shafi, S., & Junaid, M. (2025). The impact of AI-driven gamification on student engagement and academic performance in English language teaching. Indus Journal of Social Sciences, 3(1), 646-656. https://doi.org/10.59075/ijss.v3i1.758
Seixas, L. R., Gomes, A. S., & de Melo Filho, I. J. (2016). Effectiveness of gamification in the engagement of students. Computers in Human Behavior, 58, 48–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.11.021
Smiderle, R., Rigo, S. J., Marques, L. B., Coelho, J. A. P. de M., & Jaques, P. A. (2020). The impact of gamification on students’ learning, engagement and behavior based on their personality traits. Smart Learning Environments, 7(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-019-0098-x
Song, J., Wang, R., Wu, X., & Zhang, Z. (2025). Unboxing autonomous motivation, controlled motivation, and oral skills among EFL learners: Insights into gamification through the lens of broaden-and-build theory. Learning and Motivation, 90, 102110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lmot.2025.102110
Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257–285. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1202_4
Tan, L. Y., Hu, S., Yeo, D. J., & Cheong, K. H. (2025). Artificial intelligence-enabled adaptive learning platforms: A review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 9, 100429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100429
Teepapal, T. (2025). AI-driven personalization: Unraveling consumer perceptions in social media engagement. Computers in Human Behavior, 165, 108549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2024.108549
Vidanaralage, A. J., Dharmaratne, A. T., & Haque, S. (2022). AI-based multidisciplinary framework to assess the impact of gamified video-based learning through schema and emotion analysis. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, 100109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100109
Wu, T. T. (2018). Improving the effectiveness of English vocabulary review by integrating ARCS with mobile game-based learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 34(3), 315–323. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12244
Xiao, Y., & Hew, K. F. T. (2024). Intangible rewards versus tangible rewards in gamified online learning: Which promotes student intrinsic motivation, behavioural engagement, cognitive engagement and learning performance? British Journal of Educational Technology, 55(1), 297–317. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13361
Xu, Y., Zhu, J., Wang, M., Qian, F., Yang, Y., & Zhang, J. (2024). The impact of a digital game-based AI chatbot on students’ academic performance, higher-order thinking, and behavioral patterns in an information technology curriculum. Applied Sciences, 14(15), 6418. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14156418
Yuan, L., & Liu, X. (2025). The effect of artificial intelligence tools on EFL learners' engagement, enjoyment, and motivation. Computers in Human Behavior, 162, 108474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2024.108474
Zainuddin, Z., Chu, S. K. W., Shujahat, M., & Perera, C. J. (2020). The impact of gamification on learning and instruction: A systematic review of empirical evidence. Educational Research Review, 30, 100326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100326
Zhai, C., Wibowo, S., & Li, L. D. (2024). The effects of over-reliance on AI dialogue systems on students' cognitive abilities: A systematic review. Smart Learning Environments, 11, 28. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-024-00316-7
Zhang, M. (2024). Insights on learners' FL boredom from Q methodology. Heliyon, 10(24), e41660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e41660
Zhang, N., Dai, N., & Wang, N. (2020). Motivation and second foreign language proficiency: The mediating role of foreign language enjoyment. Sustainability, 12(4), 1302. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12041302
Zhang, R., Zou, D., & Cheng, G. (2024). Self-regulated digital game-based vocabulary learning: Motivation, application of self-regulated learning strategies, EFL vocabulary knowledge development, and their interplay. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2024.2344555
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2025 Author and CALL-EJ