Impact of SORA AI-Generated Storyboards on CLIL Writing Anxiety, Motivation and Enjoyment
PDF

Keywords

Artificial Intelligence
SORA
CLIL
EFL

How to Cite

Impact of SORA AI-Generated Storyboards on CLIL Writing Anxiety, Motivation and Enjoyment. (2025). Computer-Assisted Language Learning Electronic Journal, 26(7), 46-67. https://doi.org/10.54855/

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to explore if OpenAI's SORA, an AI program that creates video storyboards, can better provide writing related affective outcomes than traditional hand drawn sequences in a Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) situation. A total of seventy-two undergraduate participants who enrolled in an English preparation program were randomly assigned to either a control or experimental group. The experimental group utilized SORA to transfigure written prompts into a brief video, while the control group produced nine hand images in a session for thirty minutes using contextual prompts. While both groups did not result in significant pre–post changes on the main scales, the control group had a statistically significant decline in motivation, while the experimental group held steady at baseline motivation levels. The engagement scores in the SORA condition were high even though students expressed concern with time and complications designing prompts. Taken together, these results provide evidence that a generative AI to complete storyboards can impact learners' motivation and engagement during CLIL writing tasks in a positive manner because it is a positive multimodal support that uncouples cognitive capacity from the drawing technicality and provides an opportunity for learners to communicate and elaborate linguistic ideas.

PDF

References

Ardasheva, Y., Tong, S. S., & Tretter, T. R. (2012). Validating the English Language Learner Motivation Scale (ELLMS). Learning and Individual Differences, 22(4), 473–483 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2012.03.001

Behrens, K. A., Marbach-Ad, G., & Kocher, T. D. (2024). AI in the genetics classroom: A useful tool but not a replacement for creative writing. Journal of Science Education and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-024-10160-6

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Chan, C. K. Y., & Tsi, L. H. Y. (2023). The AI revolution in education: Will AI replace or assist teachers in higher education? arxiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2305.01185

Chen, L., Chen, P., & Lin, Z. (2020). Artificial intelligence in education: A review. IEEE Access, 8, 75264–75278. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2988510

Chen, Y.C. (2024). Perceptions of AI-facilitated creativity in language education: A study on digital storytelling. The JALT CALL Journal, 20(3), xx–xx. https://doi.org/10.29140/jaltcall.v20n3.2089

Cheng, Y. S. (2004). A measure of second language writing anxiety. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13(4), 313–335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2004.07.001

Cheung, L., & Shi, H. (2025). Co-creating stories with generative AI. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.24101.che

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum.

Coyle, D., Hood, P., & Marsh, D. (2010). CLIL: Content and language integrated learning. Cambridge University Press.

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Sage.

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01

Dewaele, J.-M., & MacIntyre, P. D. (2014). The two faces of Janus? Anxiety and enjoyment in the foreign-language classroom. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 4(2), 237–274. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2014.4.2.5

Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (4th ed.). Sage.

Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2006). How to design and evaluate research in education (6th ed.). McGraw-Hill.

Gardner, R. C. (1985). Social psychology and second language learning: The role of attitudes and motivation. Edward Arnold.

Gordon, B. M. (2011). Artificial intelligence: Approaches, tools and applications. Nova Science Publishers.

Hayes, J. R. (2012). Modeling and remodeling writing. Written Communication, 29(3), 369–388. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088312451260

Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education: Promises and implications for teaching and learning. Center for Curriculum Redesign.

Huang, X., Zou, D., Cheng, G., Chen, X., & Xie, H. (2023). Trends, research issues and applications of artificial intelligence in language education. Educational Technology & Society, 26(1), 112–131. https://doi.org/10.30191/ETS.202301_26(1).0009

Isik, A., & Isik, B. (2021). We are reading the stories we write. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 18. https://doi.org/10.56040/isik1812

Ivanytska, N., Koliasa, O., Kovalevska, T., Matsera, O., & Tkachuk, T. (2024). Analyzing the possibilities of implementation of AI and social networks in teaching foreign-language students: Ukrainian universities case study. Arab World English Journal (Special Issue on ChatGPT), 306–318. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/ChatGPT.21

Krashen, S. D. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Pergamon Press.

Lee, H., & Lee, J. H. (2024). The effects of AI-guided individualized language learning: A meta-analysis. Language Learning & Technology, 28(2), 134–162. https://hdl.handle.net/10125/73575

Li, C., Zhang, L. J., & Jiang, G. Y. (2021). Conceptualisation and measurement of foreign-language learning burnout among Chinese EFL students. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 45(4), 906–922. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2021.1931246

López-Medina, E. F., & Casado, J. M. (2024). CLIL, a competence-based coping strategy against foreign-language anxiety in higher education. Discover Psychology, 4, 68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44202-024-00187-6

MacIntyre, P. D., & Gardner, R. C. (1991). Investigating language-class anxiety using the focused-essay technique. The Modern Language Journal, 75(3), 296–304. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1991.tb05358.x

McCarthy, J., Minsky, M. L., Rochester, N., & Shannon, C. E. (1955). A proposal for the Dartmouth summer research project on artificial intelligence. AI Magazine, 27(4), 12–14.

Mettewie, L., Van Mensel, L., De Smet, A., & Galand, B. (2024). A longitudinal test of the impact of CLIL on language emotions and learning motivation. System, 117, 103355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2024.103355

Mohammed, S. J., & Khalid, M. W. (2025). Under the world of AI-generated feedback on writing: Mirroring motivation, foreign language peace of mind, trait emotional intelligence, and writing development. Language Testing in Asia, 15(7), Article 43. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-025-00343-2

Niloy, A. C., Akter, S., Sultana, N., Sultana, J., & Rahman, S. I. U. (2024). Is ChatGPT a menace for creative-writing ability? An experiment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 40(2), 919–933. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12929

Noels, K. A. (2001). Learning Spanish as a second language: Learners’ orientations and perceptions of their instructors’ communication style. Language Learning, 51(1), 107–144.

O’Brien, H. L., Cairns, P., & Hall, M. (2018). A practical approach to measuring user engagement. International Journal of Human–Computer Studies, 112, 28–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2018.01.004

Ouyang, F., & Jiao, P. (2021). Artificial-intelligence in education: The three paradigms. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2, 100020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100020

Paivio, A. (1991). Dual-coding theory: Retrospect and current status. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 45(3), 255–287. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0084295

Printer, L. (2023). Positive emotions and intrinsic motivation: A self-determination theory perspective on using co-created stories in the language-acquisition classroom. Language Teaching Research. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688231204443

Ramezanzadeh, A., & Ebadi, S. (2024). AI-generated storytelling for socially just EFL pedagogy: Exploring learner emotions through Fraser’s justice theory. System, 116, 103588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2024.103588

Roll, I., & Wylie, R. (2016). Evolution and revolution in artificial intelligence in education. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 26(2), 582–599. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-016-0110-3

Song, C., & Song, Y. (2023). Enhancing academic-writing skills and motivation: Assessing the efficacy of ChatGPT in AI-assisted language learning for EFL students. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, Article 1260843. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1260843

Stewart, N., & Zheng, Y. (2024). Generative AI’s recolonization of EFL classrooms. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.24091.ste

Sweller, J. (2010). Cognitive load theory: Recent theoretical advances. In J. L. Plass, R. Moreno, & R. Brünken (Eds.), Cognitive load theory (pp. 29–47). Cambridge University Press.

Tsz Kit, N. G. D., Luo, W., Chan, H., & Chu, S. (2022). An examination of primary students’ development in AI literacy through digital-story writing. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, 100054. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100054

Verdenhofa, O., Kinderis, R., & Berjozkina, G. (2024). AI as a creative partner: How artificial intelligence impacts student creativity and innovation. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, 10(5), 111–119. https://doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2024-10-5-111-119

Villabona, N., & Cenoz, J. (2022). The integration of content and language in CLIL: A challenge for content-driven and language-driven teachers. Language, Culture & Curriculum, 35(1), 36–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2021.1910703

Wang, D. (2024). Teacher- versus AI-generated (Poe application) corrective feedback and language learners’ writing anxiety, complexity, fluency, and accuracy. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 25(3), Article 7646. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v25i3.7646

Wang, H., Fu, T., Du, Y., Gao, W., Huang, K., Liu, Z., … Marks, D. (2023). Scientific discovery in the age of artificial intelligence. Nature, 620(7972), 47–56. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06221-2

Wang, H.-C. (2021). Exploring the relationships of achievement motivation and state anxiety to creative-writing performance in English as a foreign language. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 42, 100948. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100948

Woo, D. J., Guo, K., & Salas-Pilco, S. Z. (2024). Writing creative stories with AI: Learning designs for secondary-school students. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2024.2384884

Woo, D. J., Guo, K., & Susanto, H. (2023). Exploring EFL students’ prompt engineering in human-AI story writing: An Activity-Theory perspective. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2306.01798

Wu, X. Y. (2024). Artificial intelligence in L2 learning: A meta-analysis of contextual, instructional, and social-emotional moderators. System, 116, 103498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2024.103498

Zhu, X., Zhan, J., & Yao, Y. (2022). A latent-profile analysis of Chinese EFL learners’ enjoyment and anxiety in reading and writing: Associations with imaginative capacity and story-continuation writing performance. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2022-0105

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2025 Author and CALL-EJ