Technology Use in English Language Teaching: Insights from TPACK, SAMR, and TAM Frameworks
PDF

Keywords

SAMR framework, TPACK, Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), ELT, higher education

How to Cite

Technology Use in English Language Teaching: Insights from TPACK, SAMR, and TAM Frameworks. (2025). Computer-Assisted Language Learning Electronic Journal, 26(6), 124-145. https://doi.org/10.54855/

Abstract

The integration of digital technologies in the EFL context has modernised teaching and learning. Teachers can leverage a variety of digital tools, platforms, and applications to enhance their methods and address diverse learning styles. Despite the widespread acceptance of digital tools among learners, not all teachers fully exploit their potential. Pre-service teachers, in particular, must be prepared for the dynamic nature of technology in education. This paper maps the current state of digital tool use among in-service teachers and explores the attitudes of pre-service teachers towards these tools. The study was conducted at Trnava University in Trnava, Slovakia, and holistically examined the perspectives of both teachers and pre-service teachers through three frameworks: the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), the SAMR framework, and the Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) framework. Data were collected through interviews with in-service teachers and a questionnaire targeting the views of pre-service teachers. The qualitative data were evaluated through thematic coding, and the quantitative data were analysed statistically. The findings indicate notable similarities between the two groups, particularly in their preference for efficient and user-friendly tools. Learners emphasise engagement and interactivity, while teachers prioritise tools that support effective classroom management and maintain pedagogical accuracy.

PDF

References

Abu-Baker, M. I. K., Abu-Zaid, M. K. S., Alsawalqah, H., Al-Shamayleh, Y., & Al-Shboul, B. (2019). The Impact of the Implementation of Capability Maturity Model Integration on User Satisfaction: Case Study on Software Companies in Jordan. J. Softw., 14(7), 293-311. https://doi.org/10.17706/jsw.14.7.293-311

Akram, H., Abdelrady, A. H., Al-Adwan, A. S., & Ramzan, M. (2022). Teachers’ perceptions of technology integration in teaching-learning practices: A systematic review. Frontiers in psychology, 13, 920317. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.920317

AlDakhil, M., & AlFadda, H. (2022). EFL learners’ perceptions regarding the use of Busuu application in language learning: evaluating the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). English Language Teaching, 15(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v15n1p1

Alfadda, H. A., & Mahdi, H. S. (2021). Measuring students’ use of zoom application in language course based on the technology acceptance model (TAM). Journal of psycholinguistic research, 50(4), 883-900. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-020-09752-1

Al-Khalidi, I., & Nizwa, O. (2021). Examining Teachers’ Beliefs on Developing a Digital Pedagogical Framework Based on the SAMR Model for Undergraduate English Language Learning. International Journal of English Language Education, 9(1), 106-125. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijele.v9i1.18306

Aydemir, S., & Demirkan, Ö. (2024). The Effect of Digital Material Applications on Preservice Teachers' Self-Efficacy towards Educational Technology Standards. International Journal of Educational Researchers, 15(4), 43-68. https://doi.org/10.29329/ijer.2024.1085.3

Basilotta-Gómez-Pablos, V., Matarranz, M., Casado-Aranda, L. A., & Otto, A. (2022). Teachers’ digital competencies in higher education: a systematic literature review. International journal of educational technology in higher education, 19(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00312-8

Barrett, A., Pack, A., Guo, Y., & Wang, N. (2023). Technology acceptance model and multi-user virtual reality learning environments for Chinese language education. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(3), 1665-1682. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1855209

Blundell, C. N., Mukherjee, M., & Nykvist, S. (2022). A scoping review of the application of the SAMR model in research. Computers and Education Open, 3, 100093. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2022.100093

Bui, T. H. (2022). English teachers’ integration of digital technologies in the classroom. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 3, 100204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2022.100204

Chang, C. C., Yan, C. F., & Tseng, J. S. (2012). Perceived convenience in an extended technology acceptance model: Mobile technology and English learning for college students. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28(5), 809-826. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13165

Cepeda-Moya, V. E. & Argudo Serrano, J. C. (2022). Teachers' and students’ perceptions on introducing the SAMR model into their classroom. Revista Arbitrada Interdisciplinaria KOINONIA Año VII. Vol VII. N°1. Edición Especial. 2022. https://doi.org/10.35381/r.k.v7i1.1679

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008

DeepL. (2025). DeepL Translator (Version 1.0) [Software]. https://www.deepl.com/translator

Ding, L., & Hong, Z. (2024). On the relationship between pre-service teachers’ sense of self-efficacy and emotions in the integration of technology in their teacher developmental programs. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 33(4), 869-878. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-023-00758-6

Drajati, N. A., Tan, L., Haryati, S., Rochsantiningsih, D., & Zainnuri, H. (2018). Investigating English language teachers in developing TPACK and multimodal literacy. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 7(3), 575-582. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v7i3.9806

Farjon, D., Smits, A., & Voogt, J. (2019). Technology integration of pre-service teachers explained by attitudes and beliefs, competency, access, and experience. Computers & Education, 130, 81-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.11.010

Fathali, S., & Okada, T. (2018). Technology acceptance model in technology-enhanced OCLL contexts: A self-determination theory approach. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 34(4), 138-154. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.3629

Fernández-Batanero, J. M., Montenegro-Rueda, M., Fernández-Cerero, J., & García-Martínez, I. (2022). Digital competences for teacher professional development. Systematic review. European Journal of Teacher Education, 45(4), 513-531. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2020.1827389

Field, A. (2024). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (6th ed.). Sage.

Granić, A., & Marangunić, N. (2019). Technology acceptance model in educational context: A systematic literature review. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(5), 2572-2593. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12864

Ho, Y. Y., & Lim, L. (2021). Targeting student learning needs: The development and preliminary validation of the Learning Needs Questionnaire for a diverse university student population. Higher Education Research & Development, 40(7), 1452-1465. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2020.1818062

Hsu, H. T., & Lin, C. C. (2022). Extending the technology acceptance model of college learners’ mobile‐assisted language learning by incorporating psychological constructs. British Journal of Educational Technology, 53(2), 286-306. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.818

Jackson, A., & Shyamsundar, S. (2022). Integration of MS Teams as an LMS Tool for Language Classroom: An Analysis using SAMR Model. International Journal of Humanities and Education Development (IJHED), 4(6), 91-95. https://doi.org/10.22161/jhed.4.6.9

Kim, G. M., & Lee, S. J. (2016). Korean students' intentions to use mobile-assisted language learning: Applying the technology acceptance model. International Journal of Contents, 12(3), 47-53. https://doi.org/10.5392/IJoC.2016.12.3.047

Klimova, B., Pikhart, M., Polakova, P., Cerna, M., Yayilgan, S. Y., & Shaikh, S. (2023). A systematic review on the use of emerging technologies in teaching English as an applied language at the university level. Systems, 11(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems11010042

Koh, J. H., & Divaharan, H. (2011). Developing pre-service teachers’ technology integration expertise through the TPACK-developing instructional model. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 44(1), 35-58. https://doi.org/10.2190/EC.44.1.c

Lee, K. W., Ngui, W., Yu, C. X., & August, A. L. (2024). Pre-service Teachers’ Perceptions of Digital Portfolio in Enhancing Learning Experiences During Teaching Practice. Computer-Assisted Language Learning Electronic Journal, 25(2), 91-108.

Liashuk, X. (2022). Relation between Moodle activity and student performance in the context of EFL training in higher education. Journal of Language and Cultural Education, 10(1), 25-37. https://doi.org/10.2478/jolace-2022-0003

Lisa, A., Faridi, A., Bharati, D. A. L., & Saleh, M. (2021). A TPACK-in Practice Model for Enhancing EFL Students' Readiness to Teach with Ed-Tech Apps. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 15(17). https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v15i17.23465

Liu, X., & Moeller, A. J. (2019). Promoting learner engagement through interactive digital tools.Mobile Technologies, 15(17), 156-176. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v15i17.23465

Liza, K., & Andriyanti, E. (2020). Digital literacy scale of English pre-service teachers and their perceived readiness toward the application of digital technologies. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 14(1), 74-79. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v14i1.13925

Lyddon, P. A. (2019). A reflective approach to digital technology implementation in language teaching: Expanding pedagogical capacity by rethinking substitution, augmentation, modification, and redefinition. TESL Canada Journal, 36(3), 186-200. https://doi.org/10.18806/tesl.v36i3.1327

Mackey, A., & Gass, S. M. (Eds.). (2011). Research methods in second language acquisition: A practical guide. John Wiley & Sons.

Milutinović, V. (2022). Examining the influence of pre-service teachers’ digital native traits on their technology acceptance: A Serbian perspective. Education and Information Technologies, 27(5), 6483-6511. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-10887-y

Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers college record, 108(6), 1017-1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x

Nair, R. S., & Chuan, T. C. (2021). Integrating technology that uses modified SAMR model as a pedagogical framework in evaluating learning performance of undergraduates. The Educational Review, USA, 5(10), 373-384. https://doi.org/10.26855/er.2021.10.001

Nguyen, L. A. T., & Habók, A. (2024). Tools for assessing teacher digital literacy: a review. Journal of Computers in Education, 11(1), 305-346. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-022-00257-5

Nyayu, S. Y., Heru, S., & Masagus, S. (2019). The Use of Technology Integration SAMR Model in Teaching English. IDEAS: Journal on English Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Literature, 7(1), 43-47. https://doi.org/10.24256/ideas.v7i1.720

Ölmez, R., & Ulutaş, N. K. (2023). The role of Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) in developing Turkish Pre-Service EFL teachers’ technology adoption. RumeliDE Dil ve Edebiyat Araştırmaları Dergisi, (33), 1253-1272. https://doi.org/10.29000/rumelide.1286022

Paneru, D. R. (2018). Information communication technologies in teaching English as a foreign language: Analysing EFL teachers’ TPACK in Czech elementary schools. CEPS journal, 8(3), 141-163. https://doi.org/10.25656/01:16009

Park, M., & Son, J. B. (2022). Pre-service EFL teachers’ readiness in computer-assisted language learning and teaching. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 42(2), 320-334. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2020.1815649

Pozas, M., & Letzel, V. (2023). “Do you think you have what it takes?”–exploring predictors of pre-service teachers’ prospective ICT use. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 28(2), 823-841. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-021-09551-0

Pratiwi, D. I., & Waluyo, B. (2023). Autonomous Learning and the Use of Digital Technologies in Online English Classrooms in Higher Education. Contemporary Educational Technology, 15(2), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/13094

Puentedura, R. R. (2006). Transformation, Technology, and Education. Hippasus. Retrieved from http://www.hippasus.com

Setiawan, I. (2018). Exploring a teacher educator’s experiences in modeling TPACK to create English language multimedia in technology courses (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Negeri Makassar). https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.0905.19

Shahid, C., Gurmani, M. T., Rehman, S. U., & Saif, L. (2023). The role of technology in English language learning in online classes at tertiary level. Journal of Social Sciences Review, 3(2), 232-247. https://doi.org/10.54183/jssr.v3i2.215

Siswaningsih, W., Firman, H., & Khoirunnisa, A. (2017, February). Development of two-tier diagnostic test pictorial-based for identifying high school students misconceptions on the mole concept. In Journal of Physics: conference series, 812(1), 1-7. IOP Publishing. -https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/812/1/012117

Siyuan, C., & Wah, L. K. (2024). Blended Learning Approach in Learning English Communication Skills for Japanese College Students. Computer-Assisted Language Learning Electronic Journal, 25(2), 47-70.

Taber, K. S. (2018). The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Research in science education, 48(6), 1273-1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2

Tai, H. C., Pan, M. Y., & Lee, B. O. (2015). Applying Technological Pedagogical and Content Knowledge (TPACK) model to develop an online English writing course for nursing students. Nurse education today, 35(6), 782-788. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2015.02.016

Torres-Hernández, N., & Gallego-Arrufat, M. J. (2022). Indicators to assess preservice teachers’ digital competence in security: A systematic review. Education and information technologies, 27(6), 8583-8602. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-10978-w

Tseng, J. J., Chai, C. S., Tan, L., & Park, M. (2022). A critical review of research on technological pedagogical and content knowledge (TPACK) in language teaching. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(4), 948-971. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1868531

Urip, S., Reli, H., Faruq, U. M., & Mujiyono, W. (2022). Determinants of technology acceptance model (TAM) towards ICT use for English language learning. Journal of Language and Education, 8(2 (30)), 17-30. https://doi.org/10.17323/jle.2022.12467

Vančová, H. (2021). Teaching English pronunciation using technology. Kirsch Verlag.

Wahyuni, S., Mujiyanto, J., Rukmini, D., & Fitriati, S. W. (2020). Teachers’ Technology Integration into English Instructions: SAMR Model. Proceedings of the International Conference on Science and Education and Technology (ISET 2019). https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200620.109

Watson, J. H., & Rockinson-Szapkiw, A. (2021). Predicting preservice teachers’ intention to use technology-enabled learning. Computers & Education, 168, 104207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104207

Yildiz Durak, H. (2021). Preparing pre-service teachers to integrate teaching technologies into their classrooms: Examining the effects of teaching environments based on open-ended, hands-on and authentic tasks. Education and Information Technologies, 26(5), 5365-5387. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10511-5

Záhorec, J., Hašková, A., & Munk, M. (2021). Self-Reflection of Digital Literacy of Primary and Secondary School Teachers: Case Study of Slovakia. European Journal of Contemporary Education, 10(2), 496-508. https://doi.org/10.13187/ejced.2021.2.496

Zhang, W. (2022). The role of technology-based education and teacher professional development in English as a foreign language classes. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 910315. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.910315

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2025 Author and CALL-EJ