Collaboration among Tertiary English Teachers in Chinese Universities: Attitudes and the Role of Technology in Collaborative Practice

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54855/callej.252648

Keywords:

English teachers at tertiary level, Collaboration, Attitude, Technology

Abstract

Effective teacher collaboration is critical for professional growth in the 21st century. However, teacher collaboration in China faces two significant challenges: a lack of awareness and a limited willingness among educators to engage in collaborative practices. Despite the importance of this issue, little is known about the attitudes of tertiary English teachers toward collaboration, or the role technology plays in fostering collaborative practices. This study aims to address these gaps by investigating the attitudes of tertiary English teachers on collaboration and examining how technology influences their collaborative activities. Using a mixed-methods design, data were collected from 219 full-time English teachers at universities in China through a 5-point Likert scale questionnaire. In addition 20 full-time English teachers participated in interviews.. The findings reveal that tertiary English teachers generally have a positive attitude toward collaboration. Tertiary English teachers adopt various digital tools in their efforts to collaborate and these have played a significant role in enhancing teachers’ willingness to facilitate the collaborative process. These results underscore the importance of leveraging technology and fostering a shift in attitudes to promote a more collaborative environment among English language instructors at Chinese universities.

Author Biographies

  • Lang Zuo, Hainan Vocational University of Science and Technology

    Lang Zuo is a PhD student at the School of Education, Taylors University. With over eight years of experience in administrative roles and more than three years as an English teacher in higher education, she has developed a strong research interest in teacher collaboration, professional development, and English language teaching. Currently, she serves as a college English instructor at the College English Teaching Department, Hainan Vocational University of Science and Technology, China.

  • Pramela Krish, Taylor's University, Malaysia

    Pramela Krish is a retired Professor in Applied Linguistics from Universiti Kebangssan Malaysia. She currently serves as a Senior Research Fellow at the School of Education, Taylors University, Malaysia.

  • Jasmine Jain, Taylor's University, Malaysia

    Jasmine Jain is a senior lecturer of Education at Taylors University, Malaysia. As an advocate for scientific literacy, she leads research projects and publishes widely in areas related to learning and literacy. With more than 15 years of teaching experience and overseeing curriculum development, Jasmine also holds several technology-related professional certifications, allowing her to experiment and innovate learning integrating technology. Jasmine is currently the Director of Postgraduate Education Research programmes and the school's research coordinator at the School of Education, Taylors University Malaysia.

References

Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behaviour. In Action control: From cognition to behaviour (pp. 11-39). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin: Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-69746-3_2

Ajzen, I., & Driver, B. L. (1992). Application of the Theory of Planned Behavior to Leisure Choice. Journal of Leisure Research, 24(3), 207-224 https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.1992.11969889

Bahari, S. F. (2010). Qualitative Versus Quantitative Research Strategies: Contrasting Epistemological and Ontological Assumptions. Jurnal Teknologi. 52 (1), 17-28 https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v52.134

Borg, S., & Liu, Y. D. (2013). Chinese College English Teachers’ Research Engagement. TESOL Quarterly, 47(2), 270-299. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.56

Borko, H., & Potari, D. (Eds.). (2024). Teachers of Mathematics Working and Learning in Collaborative Groups: The 25th ICMI Study. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-56488-8

Bush, A., & Grotjohann, N. (2020). Collaboration in teacher education: A cross-sectional study on future teachers’ attitudes towards collaboration, their intentions to collaborate and their performance of collaboration. Teaching and Teacher Education, 88, 102968. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.102968

Carpenter, J. P., Kerkhoff, S. N., & Wang, X. (2022). Teachers using technology for co-teaching and crowdsourcing: The case of Global Read Aloud collaboration. Teaching and Teacher Education, 114, 103719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2022.103719

Crandall, J. J., & Christison, M. (2016). An overview of research in English language teacher education and professional development. Teacher education and professional development in TESOL, 3-34.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Sage publications.

Delgado, F., Enríquez-Flores, M., & Jaimes-Nájera, A. (2021). Lessons in the use of technology for science education during covid-19 age under a teachers’ collaboration cluster. Education Sciences, 11(9), 543. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11090543

Drossel, K., Eickelmann, B., Van Ophuysen, S., & Bos, W. (2019). Why teachers cooperate: An expectancy-value model of teacher cooperation. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 34(1), 187-208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-018-0368-y

García-Martínez, I., Montenegro-Rueda, M., Molina-Fernández, E., & Fernández-Batanero, J. M. (2021). Mapping teacher collaboration for school success. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 32(4), 631-649. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2021.1925700

García-Martínez, I., Tadeu, P., Montenegro-Rueda, M., & Fernández-Batanero, J. M. (2022). Networking for online teacher collaboration. Interactive Learning Environments, 30(9), 1736-1750. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1764057

Guo, S., Sun, T., Gong, J., Lu, Z., Zhang, L., & Wang, Q. (2022). Remote co-teaching in rural classroom: current practices, impacts, and challenges. Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3501924

Hargreaves, A. (2019). Teacher collaboration: 30 years of research on its nature, forms, limitations and effects. Teachers and Teaching, 25(5), 603-612. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2019.1639499

Kaur, J., & Debel, O. (2019). Teacher collaboration and professional development in secondary schools of Ethiopia: A literature review. IAHRW International Journal of Social Sciences Review, 7(5).

Leedy, P. D., & Ormrod. (2015). Practical Research: Planning and Design. Teaching Sociology, 18(2), 248. https://doi.org/10.2307/1318509

Liljekvist, Y. E., Randahl, A.-C., van Bommel, J., & Olin-Scheller, C. (2021). Facebook for Professional Development: Pedagogical Content Knowledge in the Centre of Teachers’ Online Communities. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 65(5), 723-735. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2020.1754900

Liu, P., & Xiu, Q. (2019). Teacher Professional Collaboration in China: Practices and Issues. Beijing International Review of Education, 1(1), 162-178. https://doi.org/10.1163/25902547-00101012

Long, D., & Liao, Q. (2021). Towards the Agency of University Foreign Language Teachers in the Context of New Liberal Arts. Foreign Language and Literature, 37(5), 139-146

Maican, C. I., Cazan, A.-M., Lixandroiu, R. C., & Dovleac, L. (2019). A study on academic staff personality and technology acceptance: The case of communication and collaboration applications. Computers & Education, 128, 113-131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.010

Mena-Guacas, A. F., Meza-Morales, J. A., Fernández, E., & López-Meneses, E. (2023). Digital Collaboration in Higher Education: A Study of Digital Skills and Collaborative Attitudes in Students from Diverse Universities. Education Sciences, 14(1), 36. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14010036

Mok, S. J., & Jain, J. (2023). Malaysian In-Service Science Teachers’ Conception of Nature of Science (NOS). In M. Koc, O. T. Ozturk & M. L. Ciddi (Eds.), Proceedings of ICRES 2023-- International Conference on Research in Education and Science (pp. 1049-1062), Cappadocia, Turkiye. ISTES Organization.

Nguyen, N., Collins, L., & Ngo, P. (2023). Effective teacher collaboration to enhance online teaching pedagogy for ELICOS teachers. English Australia Journal, 39(1), 5-23.

Rigney, J., Dana, N. F., & Vanderhauwaert, R. (2021). Cross-country collaboration in pursuit of powerful teacher professional learning: Lessons from the European Union. Teaching and Teacher Education, 97, 103212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2020.103212

Rosli, M. S., & Saleh, N. S. (2023). Technology enhanced learning acceptance among university students during Covid-19: Integrating the full spectrum of Self-Determination Theory and self-efficacy into the Technology Acceptance Model. Current Psychology, 42(21), 18212-18231. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-02996-1

Šabić, J., Baranović, B., & Rogošić, S. (2021). Teachers’ Self-efficacy for Using Information and Communication Technology: The Interaction Effect of Gender and Age. Informatics in Education, 21(2), 353-373. https://doi.org/10.15388/infedu.2022.11

Şahin, İ. (2023). Teacher collaboration in ELT research: A systematic review. Melius: Journal of Narrative and Language Studies, 1(1), 58-90.

Sancar, R., Atal, D., & Deryakulu, D. (2021). A new framework for teachers’ professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 101, 103305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103305

Schuster, J., Hartmann, U., & Kolleck, N. (2021). Teacher collaboration networks as a function of type of collaboration and schools’ structural environment. Teaching and Teacher Education, 103, 103372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103372

Vangrieken, K., Dochy, F., Raes, E., & Kyndt, E. (2015). Teacher collaboration: A systematic review. Educational Research Review, 15, 17-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.04.002

Yilmaz, K. (2022). Teachers’ Professional Collaboration: Current Status, Barriers and Suggestions. Ankara University Journal of Faculty of Educational Sciences (JFES), 55(3), 1023-1043. https://doi.org/10.30964/auebfd.1143251

Yilmaz, K., & Çeli̇K, M. (2020). Öğretmenler Arasında Mesleki İşbirliğine Yönelik Tutum Ölçeğinin Geliştirilmesi. MANAS Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 9(2), 731-740. https://doi.org/10.33206/mjss.584856

Yu, L. (2021). The impact of lesson study on teacher professional development. Education: Theses and Dissertations. http://dx.doi.org/10.26021/12541

Zhang, M., & Chen, S. (2022). Modeling dichotomous technology use among university EFL teachers in China: The roles of TPACK, affective and evaluative attitudes towards technology. Cogent Education, 9(1), 2013396. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2021.2013396

Zuo, L., Krish, P., & Jain, J. (2025). Teacher Collaboration Through Digital Tools in the 21st Century—Issues and Challenges: A Comprehensive Literature Review. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 33(1), 99-118. https://doi.org/10.47836/pjssh.33.1.05

Downloads

Published

2025-09-22

How to Cite

Collaboration among Tertiary English Teachers in Chinese Universities: Attitudes and the Role of Technology in Collaborative Practice. (2025). Computer-Assisted Language Learning Electronic Journal, 26(4), 151-168. https://doi.org/10.54855/callej.252648